U.S. v. Ailsworth
867 F.Supp. 980
D.Kan.,1994.
Oct. 27, 1994. (Approx. 1 page)

---

Following indictment for drug conspiracy and firearms-related offenses, defendants and government filed various pretrial motions. The District Court, Crow, J., held that: (1) defendants were not entitled to exclusion from evidence of information government intended to introduce through testimony of its informant, despite contention that government impermissibly delayed providing defendants with such information until after filing of defendants' pretrial motions; (2) local rule, requiring that master wheel for grand jury selection be emptied and refilled between January 1 and June 30 of year following year in which presidential election is held, was not violated; and (3) possibility that defendants might be convicted of conspiracy under aiding and abetting theory or Pinkerton theory did not preclude defendants from introducing evidence tending to demonstrate they were not physically present at time crime was committed.
Defendants' motions denied.