U.S. v. Ailsworth
914 F.Supp. 426
D.Kan.,1995.

After entry of order concluding that government violated plea agreements by asking improper questions during polygraph examination, 899 F.Supp. 511, defendants filed motions renewing their objections to format of second polygraph examination. The District Court, Crow, J., held that: (1) defendants' request that examination be conducted "in association with qualified and trained examiner of defendant's choosing" was blatant attempt to modify terms of plea agreements, and (2) court did not participate in plea negotiations or otherwise abandon its role as impartial arbiter of disputes.
Motions denied.